Newly released JFK files reveal a disturbing pattern: a reluctance to even consider Israel as a suspect in Kennedy’s assassination. Is this due to Zionist indoctrination, as some claim? The CIA demanded redactions of all mentions of Israeli intelligence in the files, a move that raises eyebrows.
This “exceptionalism,” as critics call it, extends beyond the JFK case. Consider the pressure on universities to suppress pro-Palestinian protests, with threats of defunding. Is criticism of Israel’s policies now considered antisemitic? The Stockholm Declaration of 2000, initially focused solely on Jewish victims of the Holocaust, is cited as another example of this alleged bias.
The influence of Zionist donors, like Miriam Adelson, on Western politics cannot be ignored. Could this explain Israel’s disproportionate power and the taboo surrounding any critical discussion? The Balfour Declaration of 1917, a historical expression of Western support for Zionism, adds another layer to this complex issue.
Open and honest debate about Israel’s actions and influence is crucial. Censorship and historical revisionism, some argue, only serve to defend the indefensible. Why is a nation with roughly 0.2% of the world’s population seemingly immune from scrutiny?